Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Recenti Prog Med ; 112(3): 207-215, 2021 03.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1123709

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The recent lockdown, resulting from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, has had a strong social and psychological impact on the most fragile individuals and family structures. In the present work we investigated the experience of families without specific elements of social or health vulnerability during the quarantine period that occurred in the spring of 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May and July 2020, 22 primary care pediatricians belonging to AUSL Romagna administered to a number of families a questionnaire to detect changes that occurred, during the lockdown, in family environment, school attendance and personal attitudes. RESULTS: A total of 721 questionnaires were collected, analyzing the associations between variables relating to home environment, daily rhythms, school and warning signs in relation to the age of children. As a result of the lockdown, family habits changed in 31% of cases, with a greater presence of the reference figure in 68% of these. Three out of four families reported they had sufficient domestic spaces, and nine out of ten had access to an outdoor, private or condominium space. Daily rhythms were preserved in 56.7% of cases; mood disorders appeared in 30% of adolescent children, followed by sleep, appetite and psychosomatic disorders. One in three children has made progress in terms of evolution and behavior, and one in 5 children has seen their relationships improve. The overall resilience of families during the lockdown period was considered good in 66.3%, sufficient in 31.3% and not satisfactory in only 2.4% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that, in the interviewed families, the simultaneous presence of adults and children at home has generally intensified. Families refer, on the whole, a positive and resilient behavior in the lockdown period, even if initial emotional problems are reported in one out of three children-adolescents. The ability to maintain a family organized structure seems to be partially compromised. Forced cohabitation leads to competition for the same resources of time and space and affects the entire family unit. The school institution emerges as a protective factor for children, young people and also for the well-being of families themselves.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Community Medicine , Family Relations/psychology , Pandemics , Pediatricians , Psychology, Adolescent , Psychology, Child , Quarantine/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Crowding/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/etiology , Female , Health Care Surveys , Housing , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Mood Disorders/etiology , Parents/psychology , Psychophysiologic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychophysiologic Disorders/etiology , Schools , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/etiology
2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(1)2021 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1066039

ABSTRACT

Effective states govern by some combination of enforcement and voluntary compliance. To contain the COVID-19 pandemic, a critical decision is the extent to which policy makers rely on voluntary as opposed to enforced compliance, and nations vary along this dimension. While enforcement may secure higher compliance, there is experimental and other evidence that it may also crowd out voluntary motivation. How does enforcement affect citizens' support for anti-COVID-19 policies? A survey conducted with 4,799 respondents toward the end of the first lockdown in Germany suggests that a substantial share of the population will support measures more under voluntary than under enforced implementation. Negative responses to enforcement-termed control aversion-vary across the nature of the policy intervention (e.g., they are rare for masks and frequent for vaccination and a cell-phone tracing app). Control aversion is less common among those with greater trust in the government and the information it provides, and among those who were brought up under the coercive regime of East Germany. Taking account of the likely effectiveness of enforcement and the extent to which near-universal compliance is crucial, the differing degrees of opposition to enforcement across policies suggest that for some anti-COVID-19 policies an enforced mandate would be unwise, while for others it would be essential. Similar reasoning may also be relevant for policies to address future pandemics and other societal challenges like climate change.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Crowding/psychology , Health Policy , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Government , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Politics , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Trust , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL